Posts Tagged ‘television’

First impressions of The Apprentice candidates 2011

Sunday, May 15th, 2011

As I have said time and time again in both interviews and in my classes, making a first impression is vital, in both a social and business context. Getting those first few seconds correct can make or break a career or relationship. A firm handshake and charming manner is key but what is harder to get right is one’s appearance.

Earlier this we saw the new candidates on Lord Sugar’s ‘The Apprentice’. As usual, I despaired at how arrogant and unappealing most of them seemed. I am well aware that sly editing may have been at work, but there is nothing the cutting room floor can do to change the way in which the candidates wear their business attire. What we wear and how we chose (consciously or subconsciously) to wear it is often overlooked, yet incredibly important.

Glenn Ward

Glenn Ward

From his profile picture of the BBC programme’s website we see him wearing possibly the worst men’s fashion accessory in the world – the skinny tie. Yuck. Not only this, but he has chosen to wear an insipid grey shirt with the grey tie, together with a grey suit. Grey, on grey, on grey. Need I say more? There’s nothing wrong with grey suits, I should point out. Quite the contrary, although I prefer a navy suit myself (on me) as grey sometimes washes me out: it works better on people with darker hair.

Leon Doyle

Leon Doyle

Several of the men, including Leon, have the same problem – ill-fitting shirt collars. Shirt collars should sit snuggly around the neck. You should not, as we saw with Leon’s collar in episode one, be able to fit a bus between the top button and the neck. In Leon’s profile picture his shirt is much better than it was in the first two episodes, but there is still a bit of room for improvement. Getting your collar size measured properly in any half-decent men’s outfitters or department store will avoid baggy collars.

Gavin Winstanley

Gavin Winstanley

In Gavin’s profile picture he is wearing a black (or charcoal) suit with a black tie. He looks like he’s going to a funeral. The tie is a gentleman’s opportunity to inject some personality into his day’s outfit. Opting for a tie that has no colour whatsoever is a brave move. Gavin has also chosen not to shave and has ‘designer stubble’. I find only the very good looking can pull off this look, and whilst Gavin is no ugly duckling, he is working in business and I am not sure whether stubble is really appropriate for the workplace. He should make his mind up whether he wants to be clean shaven or have a beard.

Tom Pellereau

Tom Pellereau

Tom has the same fondness of stubble as Gavin. He also has the baggy collar syndrome I mentioned earlier. Tom is the only bespectacled member of the candidates. I’d say that his glasses actually work for his face and colouring. I have to wear glasses sometimes and I have found that (being fair) dark glasses, such as Tom’s, make me look too severe. Lighter colours work better with fairer complexions, and darker glasses with darker features. Tom’s tie in the picture is a diagonal stripe, and just about works. When opting for ties with stripes, English gentlemen should be careful that they are not inadvertently wearing or sporting the design of an exclusive gentleman’s club (no, I do not mean a strip club) or of a public school.

Vincent Disneur

Vincent Disneur

Oh dear. For someone who claims to be a perfectionist, Vincent really needs to sort his appearance out. A good hair cut wouldn’t go a miss, and I’d ditch the demi-goatee look. His moustache draws attention to the fact that he’s got a large nose, which I personally would want to detract people’s attention from if I were him.

Jim Eastwood

Jim Eastwood

Jim gets the award for best dressed in the profile pictures. His collar fits, he is clean-cut with a sensible and business-like haircut, and he has opted for a tie that catches the eye and lifts his outfit. All of the male candidates, safe for Glen, have chosen to wear white shirts, which I applaud. Although some would say this is the safe option, I think the classic crisp white shirt is a staple of the gentleman’s wardrobe. I have a million and they are one of my prized possessions within my closet. A white shirt can be worn with any colour tie and so if you are not brilliant with putting together ‘a look’ then you can’t really go too wrong with a white shirt, which provides a neutral canvas.

Read about what I consider to be the best look for gentlemen for business. Click here.

Strictly, China & the Royal Wedding

Saturday, April 2nd, 2011

It’s been a busy old few months! Ever since the Royal Wedding was announced at the end of last year I have been speaking (or have been asked) about very little else. It’s wonderful news for the Monarchy, country and the couple themselves and I cannot be prouder to be British at the moment. BUT… could Prince Harry just wait at least three years before he announces his engagement? I need a rest.

That said, come early February I had thought the press and nation were not interested, as apart from one or two exceptions, I had received very few Royal Wedding-related press requests. However, come the beginning of March they soon enough started to roll in, snowballing. And they are still coming – just weeks away from the actual event. Having spoken to the wonderful television presenter Victoria Arbiter, whom I met whilst we filmed something for Canada’s CTV (airing sometime in April), she said that she had received very few media bids until quite recently. What has obviously happened is broadcasters had forgotten how soon things comes around and then all panicked at once as they put together their programming for ‘wedding week’.

Filming in progress for CTV

Victoria Arbiter & Alexandra Messervy filming for CTV

Not only have I been living, talking and breathing the Royal Wedding, but also I have been preparing for my trip to China – which I begin on Tuesday. I have been invited over there on a speaking tour where I shall be addressing audiences on the essence of British-ness and what it means to be a gentleman. I shall be staying in Guangzhou, which is north of Hong Kong. I have heard all sorts of stories about the cuisine and various other things, so I was having mixed feelings, but I am actually (now) quite looking forward to the whole experience. I will be over there for 12 days, and then return for a week’s breather before ‘wedding week’ kicks off. I hope to blog from China – but I may get distracted so please don’t hold me to anything!

One of the most enjoyable things of my year, if not life, happened earlier this week. I was invited back to my alma mater, Clifton College, to sit on the judging panel of a fund-raising event entitled ‘Strictly Scrum Dancing’. My followers on Twitter will know that the BBC’s ‘Strictly Come Dancing’ is my favourite show in the whole world and so to be asked to take part in something like this was joyous. I had great expectations before the event and did worry that perhaps as I had been looking forward to it so much, the actual event would disappoint. Well – au contraire! It exceeded all expectations. Never have I had so much fun. I had been asked to be the ‘nasty’ judge (or, as I saw it, ‘fair’). Having hundreds of people booing you is really quite a feeling, and I loved every second of it. We did two shows – a matinee and an evening performance. What was good about the afternoon show (which was shorter than the second) was we could use it as a practice round for the main event, which for me meant I could be bitchier and my put-downs more finely tuned. I am not sure yet how much we raised but I suspect it’ll be at least £3,000 (having done some very rudimentary sums). I think I enjoyed it so much because for most of my life (as it’s the polite, and right, thing to do) I spend my time being nice to people and thinking of other people, there is very little scope, time or need to be ‘nasty’. And so I just let rip. I was even told in the evening (by the dancers) I could be even bitchier! Well, talk about red rag to a bull.

 

Judges for Strictly Scrum Dancing

In character for judging Strictly Scrum Dancing*

I had better finish off cooking dinner for my family, who are staying with me this weekend (Mothers’ Day tomorrow in the UK). We are having a pea, mint and pancetta soup, followed by Greek lamb tray bake, and finally white chocolate, almond and date brioche Panini.

Joi wooi (that’s goodbye in Cantonese!)

*Image courtesy of Amelia Allen.

Thoroughly Modern Monarchy

Saturday, December 4th, 2010

I was overjoyed when I heard that Prince William was to marry Kate Middleton: mainly as I happened to be in London at the time, which meant I was able to do a round of interviews for various media outlets on the subject, but also I was happy for the couple themselves.

You can’t meet a more pro-Royal than I, but during the day of the announcement I began to think about the future of the Monarchy with Prince William (or even Charles) at the helm.

Her Majesty does not give interviews, and microphones are never placed near Her unless it is for a direct message to her subjects (the Christmas address, for example). By banning microphones one is rarely privy to Her Majesty’s conversation or speech. To me, this helps maintain the mystique of Monarchy. Similarly, The Queen has never given an interview for publication to anyone in Her life – an air of mystery is created. However Princes Charles and William have given many interviews in their time as heirs to the throne; the latter has even been ‘interrogated’ (and I use that word lightly) by Fearne Cotton. I agree that once Her Majesty has died (and I hope that is not any time soon) we should have a more modern Monarchy (and by that I do not mean that Princess Beatrice starts detailing the contents of Her fridge in the back of Heat) but if the Monarchy and its mechanics are revealed and opened up too much then it will become nothing more than a glorified Big Brother. And when – no, if – that happens then most of the pull factor for tourists will be lost.

When I was in London the other week I was standing outside Buckingham Palace and in-between filming (I was doing a piece for Canadian television on the Changing of the Guard… thank you, God…) I started chatting with some tourists from New Zealand. They were desperately hoping to see The Queen, they told me. Now, I could have told them there and then that the chances of seeing Her Majesty – or any Royal – was slim. But if we imagine my worst nightmare of a Monarchy where Beatrice is in Heat, will we see the then King coming out at certain set times of the day to sign autographs and have His grinning picture taken by camera phones? The tourists will not find the Monarchy so appealing as it will descend into nothing more than a red carpet farce. And so, the tourists will not come and the British economy will not be injected with the much-needed revenue that it gets from all their visits.

Now, please do not get me wrong – my sole argument for having a Monarchy is not that it is jolly nice for the tourists. But it is one of them. Monarchy should be detached and remote. The Royal Family aren’t like you and me (mainly you) and never will be, and never should be expected to be. Those who fuss about the ‘great expense’ to the taxpayer are bonkers: I do not know what the figure for how much the Monarchy costs each person is exactly but it is something like 20p per year. Do people actually think they will be better off with an extra 20p a year? Give me a break!

So, my message to Prince William and his future bride is (apart from many congratulations) please strongly consider any media offers or interview bids that you may get your way in the future. We need strong and powerful figureheads. The moment Kate appears on Dancing on Ice is the day I lead the march for a republic.