It’s been a busy old few months! Ever since the Royal Wedding was announced at the end of last year I have been speaking (or have been asked) about very little else. It’s wonderful news for the Monarchy, country and the couple themselves and I cannot be prouder to be British at the moment. BUT… could Prince Harry just wait at least three years before he announces his engagement? I need a rest.
That said, come early February I had thought the press and nation were not interested, as apart from one or two exceptions, I had received very few Royal Wedding-related press requests. However, come the beginning of March they soon enough started to roll in, snowballing. And they are still coming – just weeks away from the actual event. Having spoken to the wonderful television presenter Victoria Arbiter, whom I met whilst we filmed something for Canada’s CTV (airing sometime in April), she said that she had received very few media bids until quite recently. What has obviously happened is broadcasters had forgotten how soon things comes around and then all panicked at once as they put together their programming for ‘wedding week’.
Not only have I been living, talking and breathing the Royal Wedding, but also I have been preparing for my trip to China – which I begin on Tuesday. I have been invited over there on a speaking tour where I shall be addressing audiences on the essence of British-ness and what it means to be a gentleman. I shall be staying in Guangzhou, which is north of Hong Kong. I have heard all sorts of stories about the cuisine and various other things, so I was having mixed feelings, but I am actually (now) quite looking forward to the whole experience. I will be over there for 12 days, and then return for a week’s breather before ‘wedding week’ kicks off. I hope to blog from China – but I may get distracted so please don’t hold me to anything!
One of the most enjoyable things of my year, if not life, happened earlier this week. I was invited back to my alma mater, Clifton College, to sit on the judging panel of a fund-raising event entitled ‘Strictly Scrum Dancing’. My followers on Twitter will know that the BBC’s ‘Strictly Come Dancing’ is my favourite show in the whole world and so to be asked to take part in something like this was joyous. I had great expectations before the event and did worry that perhaps as I had been looking forward to it so much, the actual event would disappoint. Well – au contraire! It exceeded all expectations. Never have I had so much fun. I had been asked to be the ‘nasty’ judge (or, as I saw it, ‘fair’). Having hundreds of people booing you is really quite a feeling, and I loved every second of it. We did two shows – a matinee and an evening performance. What was good about the afternoon show (which was shorter than the second) was we could use it as a practice round for the main event, which for me meant I could be bitchier and my put-downs more finely tuned. I am not sure yet how much we raised but I suspect it’ll be at least £3,000 (having done some very rudimentary sums). I think I enjoyed it so much because for most of my life (as it’s the polite, and right, thing to do) I spend my time being nice to people and thinking of other people, there is very little scope, time or need to be ‘nasty’. And so I just let rip. I was even told in the evening (by the dancers) I could be even bitchier! Well, talk about red rag to a bull.
I had better finish off cooking dinner for my family, who are staying with me this weekend (Mothers’ Day tomorrow in the UK). We are having a pea, mint and pancetta soup, followed by Greek lamb tray bake, and finally white chocolate, almond and date brioche Panini.
Joi wooi (that’s goodbye in Cantonese!)
*Image courtesy of Amelia Allen.









Thoroughly Modern Monarchy
Saturday, December 4th, 2010I was overjoyed when I heard that Prince William was to marry Kate Middleton: mainly as I happened to be in London at the time, which meant I was able to do a round of interviews for various media outlets on the subject, but also I was happy for the couple themselves.
You can’t meet a more pro-Royal than I, but during the day of the announcement I began to think about the future of the Monarchy with Prince William (or even Charles) at the helm.
Her Majesty does not give interviews, and microphones are never placed near Her unless it is for a direct message to her subjects (the Christmas address, for example). By banning microphones one is rarely privy to Her Majesty’s conversation or speech. To me, this helps maintain the mystique of Monarchy. Similarly, The Queen has never given an interview for publication to anyone in Her life – an air of mystery is created. However Princes Charles and William have given many interviews in their time as heirs to the throne; the latter has even been ‘interrogated’ (and I use that word lightly) by Fearne Cotton. I agree that once Her Majesty has died (and I hope that is not any time soon) we should have a more modern Monarchy (and by that I do not mean that Princess Beatrice starts detailing the contents of Her fridge in the back of Heat) but if the Monarchy and its mechanics are revealed and opened up too much then it will become nothing more than a glorified Big Brother. And when – no, if – that happens then most of the pull factor for tourists will be lost.
When I was in London the other week I was standing outside Buckingham Palace and in-between filming (I was doing a piece for Canadian television on the Changing of the Guard… thank you, God…) I started chatting with some tourists from New Zealand. They were desperately hoping to see The Queen, they told me. Now, I could have told them there and then that the chances of seeing Her Majesty – or any Royal – was slim. But if we imagine my worst nightmare of a Monarchy where Beatrice is in Heat, will we see the then King coming out at certain set times of the day to sign autographs and have His grinning picture taken by camera phones? The tourists will not find the Monarchy so appealing as it will descend into nothing more than a red carpet farce. And so, the tourists will not come and the British economy will not be injected with the much-needed revenue that it gets from all their visits.
Now, please do not get me wrong – my sole argument for having a Monarchy is not that it is jolly nice for the tourists. But it is one of them. Monarchy should be detached and remote. The Royal Family aren’t like you and me (mainly you) and never will be, and never should be expected to be. Those who fuss about the ‘great expense’ to the taxpayer are bonkers: I do not know what the figure for how much the Monarchy costs each person is exactly but it is something like 20p per year. Do people actually think they will be better off with an extra 20p a year? Give me a break!
So, my message to Prince William and his future bride is (apart from many congratulations) please strongly consider any media offers or interview bids that you may get your way in the future. We need strong and powerful figureheads. The moment Kate appears on Dancing on Ice is the day I lead the march for a republic.
Tags: Big Brother, British, Buckingham Palace, Changing of the Guard, Clarence House, commentator, Dancing on Ice, danger, engagement, England, English, etiquette, expert, Heat magazine, Her Majesty, Kate Middleton, monarchy, mystery, Prince Charles, Prince William, protocol, Queen Elizabeth, royal, royal wedding, television, The Queen, UK
Posted in Etiquette & manners | 2 Comments »